The Sony World Photography Awards is being accused of censorship by the photojournalist community this week after the renowned competition pulled down multiple photo series depicting the pro-Democracy protests in Hong Kong, blaming the photos’ “sensitive nature.”
The story first broke in the Hong Kong Free Press, after photographer Ko Chung-ming pointed out that his series titled Wounds of Hong Kong, a finalist in the Documentary category, had been taken down shortly after the World Photography Organization announced the finalists of the 2020 Sony World Photography Awards.
Chung-ming initially believed that the website had been hacked, until he realized that two other series related to the protests—the shortlisted Documentary series Battleground Hong Kong by David Butow and shortlisted Portrait series Hong Kong Protesters by Adam Ferguson—had also been removed.
Chung-ming’s dramatic photos depict injuries sustained by Hong Kong protesters:
When the photographer reached out to the WPO for clarification, he was told that his images had been “temporarily taken down” as part of a standard review process that takes place whenever someone raises concerns. A WPO spokesperson expanded on this in a statement to the HKFP, explaining that they receive complaints about certain finalists and shortlisted images “each year” after the shortlist is announced.
“In each and every such case we take these concerns seriously and the images in question will always be temporarily made unavailable on our platform until we complete the review process,” said the spokesperson.
Shortly after the story began to gain traction online, the webpage for Wounds of Hong Kong was restored, as was Adam Ferguson’s Portrait series Hong Kong Protesters—apparently they were found to be “in-line” with the contest’s Terms and Conditions. However, the controversy continues.
Mr. Chung-ming’s images were only partially restored—as of this writing, there are only four images up, down from five two days ago and nine images originally—with all of the more graphic images missing. And while Ferguson’s portrait series seems to have been restored in its entirety, the most dramatic of the three series that were pulled down, Butow’s Battleground Hong Kong, is still redirecting to an “Access Denied” page that requires a login:
According to the WPO, the list of finalists hasn’t changed, and nobody is being officially pulled from the competition, but the removal of all three photo projects related to Hong Kong in one fell swoop is seen as extremely troubling. The organization wouldn’t confirm who complained, saying only that “concerns were raised by individual members of our audience,” but it certainly seems those members were politically motivated if these were the only projects that were pulled for review.
Commenters on Ko’s Facebook page—where he’s posted the full series for all to see—seem to agree with this assertion. Alongside many emphatic “Thank Yous” for preserving the history of Hong Kong, supporters raised a skeptical eyebrow at the WPO’s reasoning
“Photos taken during a war right in the warzone has won numerous awards, but i’ve never seen any of those labelled ‘sensitive nature’,” wrote one supporter.
“This is fu**ing bulls**t,” wrote another. “Worse and much more ‘sensitive’ stuff has been put on WPO before, and the fact that they’re on targeting Hong Kong related photography seriously calls into question the integrity of the organization.”
We’ve reached out to the WPO for comment on the original removal, the only-partial reinstatement of the series, and have also inquired as to why Battleground Hong Kong still hasn’t been restored to the website. We will update our coverage if and when we hear back.